Dolphin Ratings - Women's National Basketball Association

Explanation: Each team is listed with its record, overall score differential, and its ratings. Brief explanations of the ratings follow.

Schedule The number in this column is the effective opponent strength of a team. In other words, they would be expected to have the same record had they played all games against an opponent of this predictive rating at a neutral site. Because this calculation depends on the strength of the team in question, it is not possible to rank schedules using these values.
Expected Losses For college teams, this number is the number of losses an average ranked (top 15 hockey; otherwise top 25) team would be expected to have against the team's schedule. For pro teams, this is the number of losses an average team would be expected to have against the team's schedule. Unlike the schedule ranking, this value can be used to rank schedules.
Standard Ranks teams in an order such that a team is "probably better" than all teams ranked lower than it. This calculation uses margin of victory only for computing a team's opponents strengths; the team's rating itself is computed using only wins, losses, and ties relative to its schedule
Median Likelihood Determines the likely ratings for each team, based on its wins, losses, and ties relative to its schedule. This generally produces the same or similar ratings as the standard ranking.
Predictive Both schedule strength and rating vs. schedule strength are determined considering both the wins and losses and the score differentials. This rating contains none of the biases in the standard rating, but does weight recent games slightly more than past games since those are a better indication of the team's current strength. This rating is the best of the first three for seeing how good teams are, and thus is the best for predicting future results.
Improved RPI Rating The improved RPI formula is similar to the standard RPI, except that the schedule strength is carried out to infinite depth instead of ending with opponents' opponents, thus allows for a better comparison of isolated groups of teams than is given by the standard RPI calculation. It is similar to the simple rating, except that all games are given equal weight.
Scoring. This value indicates how many points a team would be expected to score if it played an identical team.
Offense. This combines the predictive and scoring ratings to measure how many points a team scores. The number is the predictive rating of an opponent against whom the team would be expected to score the league average number of points. This does not necessarily rate a team's offensive abilities, as a fast pace in basketball or big-play defense in football can make a team score more points.
Defense. This combines the predictive and scoring ratings to measure how many points a team allows. The number is the predictive rating of an opponent against whom the team would be expected to allow the league average number of points. The same caveat in the predictive-offense rating applies here.

In order to increase early-season stability, the three main rankings, the improved RPI, and the college pseudopoll include priors based on the previous season final predictive ratings and occasionally incorporating preseason predictions of various major publications. The other rankings for college sports do not include priors, and thus can be wildly unstable early in the year. A team whose rankings are affected by this prior is noted with a P following its rankings.

Full Ranking

                                            STANDARD   MED LIKELY  PREDICTIVE  IMPRVD RPI    SCORING     OFFENSE     DEFENSE 
TEAM         W  L   PF   PA  SCHED  ELOSS  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING
LOS ANGELES 26 11 2676 2563  0.041 19.164    1  0.316    1  0.309    3  0.130    1 0.5461    1  3.538    1  0.572   11 -0.312
SEATTLE     26 16 2996 2759  0.041 21.439    2  0.214    2  0.185    1  0.304    2 0.5281    4  3.486    2  0.533    6  0.075
SACRAMENTO  21 19 2704 2642  0.106 21.816    3  0.093    3  0.089    2  0.161    3 0.5128    8  3.413    6  0.104    3  0.219
CONNECTICUT 23 19 2864 2810 -0.033 20.871    4  0.045    4  0.043    4  0.104    4 0.5111    5  3.437    5  0.140    8  0.068
MINNESOTA   18 18 2277 2324  0.032 19.124    5  0.018    5  0.018    7 -0.060    7 0.4990   12  3.340   12 -0.400    2  0.279
PHOENIX     17 17 2300 2235  0.023 17.481    6  0.009    6 -0.007    5  0.083    6 0.4998    6  3.430    7  0.093    7  0.074
NEW YORK    20 19 2567 2620 -0.060 19.392    7 -0.006    7 -0.013   12 -0.142    5 0.5009    9  3.402    9 -0.244    9 -0.040
WASHINGTON  18 19 2518 2599 -0.035 18.833    8 -0.030    8 -0.039   10 -0.113    8 0.4969    3  3.505    4  0.193   12 -0.420
DETROIT     18 19 2568 2588 -0.056 18.320    9 -0.036    9 -0.054    6 -0.054    9 0.4961    2  3.525    3  0.335   13 -0.442
CHARLOTTE   16 18 2092 2168 -0.053 17.055   10 -0.061   10 -0.068   11 -0.140   10 0.4917   13  3.288   13 -0.671    1  0.390
TEAM         W  L   PF   PA  SCHED  ELOSS  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING
INDIANA     15 19 2198 2245 -0.053 16.991   11 -0.105   11 -0.117    9 -0.094   11 0.4851   10  3.383   10 -0.268    5  0.079
HOUSTON     13 21 2177 2211  0.014 17.787   12 -0.144   12 -0.160    8 -0.092   12 0.4719   11  3.362   11 -0.346    4  0.162
SAN ANTONIO  9 25 2191 2364  0.008 18.211   13 -0.311   13 -0.321   13 -0.186   13 0.4457    7  3.427    8 -0.189   10 -0.182

WESTERN CONFERENCE
                                            STANDARD   MED LIKELY  PREDICTIVE  IMPRVD RPI    SCORING     OFFENSE     DEFENSE 
TEAM         W  L   PF   PA  SCHED  ELOSS  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING
LOS ANGELES 26 11 2676 2563  0.041 19.164    1  0.316    1  0.309    3  0.130    1 0.5461    1  3.538    1  0.572   11 -0.312
SEATTLE     26 16 2996 2759  0.041 21.439    2  0.214    2  0.185    1  0.304    2 0.5281    4  3.486    2  0.533    6  0.075
SACRAMENTO  21 19 2704 2642  0.106 21.816    3  0.093    3  0.089    2  0.161    3 0.5128    8  3.413    6  0.104    3  0.219
MINNESOTA   18 18 2277 2324  0.032 19.124    5  0.018    5  0.018    7 -0.060    7 0.4990   12  3.340   12 -0.400    2  0.279
PHOENIX     17 17 2300 2235  0.023 17.481    6  0.009    6 -0.007    5  0.083    6 0.4998    6  3.430    7  0.093    7  0.074
HOUSTON     13 21 2177 2211  0.014 17.787   12 -0.144   12 -0.160    8 -0.092   12 0.4719   11  3.362   11 -0.346    4  0.162
SAN ANTONIO  9 25 2191 2364  0.008 18.211   13 -0.311   13 -0.321   13 -0.186   13 0.4457    7  3.427    8 -0.189   10 -0.182

EASTERN CONFERENCE
                                            STANDARD   MED LIKELY  PREDICTIVE  IMPRVD RPI    SCORING     OFFENSE     DEFENSE 
TEAM         W  L   PF   PA  SCHED  ELOSS  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING
CONNECTICUT 23 19 2864 2810 -0.033 20.871    4  0.045    4  0.043    4  0.104    4 0.5111    5  3.437    5  0.140    8  0.068
NEW YORK    20 19 2567 2620 -0.060 19.392    7 -0.006    7 -0.013   12 -0.142    5 0.5009    9  3.402    9 -0.244    9 -0.040
WASHINGTON  18 19 2518 2599 -0.035 18.833    8 -0.030    8 -0.039   10 -0.113    8 0.4969    3  3.505    4  0.193   12 -0.420
DETROIT     18 19 2568 2588 -0.056 18.320    9 -0.036    9 -0.054    6 -0.054    9 0.4961    2  3.525    3  0.335   13 -0.442
CHARLOTTE   16 18 2092 2168 -0.053 17.055   10 -0.061   10 -0.068   11 -0.140   10 0.4917   13  3.288   13 -0.671    1  0.390
INDIANA     15 19 2198 2245 -0.053 16.991   11 -0.105   11 -0.117    9 -0.094   11 0.4851   10  3.383   10 -0.268    5  0.079

DIVISION             W   L   PCT  RNK RATING
WESTERN CONFERENCE 130 127 0.506    1  0.100
EASTERN CONFERENCE 110 113 0.493    2 -0.142

Home field advantage amounts to:
     0.336 points in main ratings (0.226 for semineutral)
     0.030 points in improved RPI (0.023 for semineutral)
Average of 2.15 points per score

Predict score:








Team Strength vs. Time Plot:






posted: Sat Jan  4 12:45:12 2020
games through: Tue Oct 12 2004

Back to Dolphin rankings main page.